How Fast Is Ryzen Quad Memory Channel in Reading in Data
Joined
·
3,702 Posts
Depends on how hard y'all throw it...
Joined
·
4,723 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by umeng2002
Depends on how hard y'all throw it...
:::doo doo dat:::
.. well, pretty tasty because they are showing a 4 ghz 8 core for one-half the toll of a 6900k. Finally the market will become shaken up.
Joined
·
2,049 Posts
Looks to be around 10% slower per clock.
This is well-nigh what I expected it to exist.
I too expect Intel's chips to clock around 10% higher...
All in all eight core Ryzen vs 6 Core i7 volition be an interesting fight - xx% faster since threaded performance from Intel. twenty% faster multi-threaded performance from AMD.
We'll encounter if that ends up being the reality. I place very little organized religion in the current speculation which is out there.
Joined
·
662 Posts
No increment going from 3.2 Ghz to iv Ghz? There'due south a bottleneck.
Joined
·
3,235 Posts
Looks like a well priced chip and then.
Joined
·
626 Posts
Looks correct in line with all the other leaked benchmarks we have seen so far, per-core strength near identical to Broadwell. Ryzen is really going to live or die on how well it tin can be overclocked. If the quad/hex-cores can reliably get into the 4.5ghz+ range, we have a winner.
Joined
·
831 Posts
Equally a 7700k owner who plays games and am in no rush to render or encode when I do, wew lad. I still wish AMD would accept taken the gaming crown, just happy I made the best choice for my needs. History continues to repeat itself. I'll be purchasing Vega regardless of annihilation nVidia does.
Joined
·
3,685 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted past variant
No increase going from 3.2 Ghz to 4 Ghz? There's a clogging.
Could be anything from crappy RAM to crappy cooling to crappy motherboards
Joined
·
6,874 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by variant
No increment going from 3.2 Ghz to 4 Ghz? There's a bottleneck.
Likely the low memory speed with high timings we take seen every Ryzen chip using :/
I really hope all those extra encryption parts in their memory controller dont limit the speed but I know that isnt likely.
Joined
·
4,190 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by variant
No increase going from 3.2 Ghz to 4 Ghz? There'southward a clogging.
I think that was artificially done to not reveal all data and keep it unknown.
Joined
·
830 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by budgetgamer120
I remember that was artificially washed to non reveal all information and go along it unknown.
That's weird since they didn't practise the same for the lower sku CPU under it. Could you lot not extrapolate per core overclock improvements based on that?
Joined
·
831 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted past budgetgamer120
I think that was artificially done to not reveal all information and continue it unknown.
Perhaps they are all turbo boosting to a like max clock.
Joined
·
662 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ducegt
Perhaps they are all turbo boosting to a similar max clock.
The turbo boost is in the CPU ID. 3.4 for the 4 core and iii.7 for the six core.
Joined
·
61 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ducegt
As a 7700k owner who plays games and am in no rush to render or encode when I do, wew lad. I still wish AMD would have taken the gaming crown, but happy I made the best choice for my needs. History continues to repeat itself. I'll exist purchasing Vega regardless of anything nVidia does.
Yeah, right. Considering that for gaming needs information technology'due south enough of basically any CPU above boilerplate.
Joined
·
831 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by variant
The turbo boost is in the CPU ID. 3.4 for the 4 core and 3.vii for the 6 core.
I'll take your word for that. I'm not certain how that works.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Game256
Yeah, right. Considering that for gaming needs information technology's enough of basically any CPU above boilerplate.
No such affair as enough. A 20FPS difference between 90 and 110 is no big deal, but it makes a large deviation down the route when comparing 30FPS with fifty.
Joined
·
eight,233 Posts
hmm, run a quick exam there.
Quote:
For comparing, my 3770k @ 4.8ghz scores 12,824
Joined
·
790 Posts
Give-and-take Starter · #18 ·
Quote:
Originally Posted by Newbie2009
hmm, run a quick test there.
For comparing, my 3770k @ 4.8ghz scores 12,824
oh , AMD Quad core at 3.ii Ghz => 10177
Joined
·
eight,233 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xuper
oh , AMD Quad cadre at 3.2 Ghz => 10177
Yup
Joined
·
6,192 Posts
This is amazing! Glad to run into such a competitive CPU from AMD again!
Source: https://www.overclock.net/threads/videocardz-how-fast-is-ryzen.1623208/
แสดงความคิดเห็น for "How Fast Is Ryzen Quad Memory Channel in Reading in Data"